Video scenes shots:
Watch the video:
| URL: | |
| Embed: |
Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment
Other videos by this author:
Video scenes shots:
Watch the video:
Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment
Other videos by this author:
Futures-Trading videos :: Social Bookmarking
:: Videos are copyright of their respective owners.return to WWW.FOREXTRADINGVIDEOTUTORIALS.COM
Latest comments made on this video:
By: daantje757. on 29 Nov 08, 10:49:44
So right.. you always hear these reporters with no clue on how an economy works, saying things like: "But isn't this neccessary for our economy, our future?". And then they go "erm" and "uhuh" when Ron Paul explains why it doesn't work that way.
By: r3dredwine. on 27 Nov 08, 04:30:56
lol thats so true:)
By: Xakryn. on 27 Nov 08, 03:02:59
Just type "JBS end fed contact congress" into google and click the top link, Send a pre wrtten letter to congress about abolishing the Federal Reserve! Send To Congress Share With Everyone
By: Xakryn. on 27 Nov 08, 03:02:39
dumb reporter doesn't fucking get it at all. Just keep making more imaginary money and make the problem even worse. Fuck you.
By: r3dredwine. on 20 Nov 08, 16:12:24
Just type "JBS end fed contact congress" into google and click the top link, Send a pre wrtten letter to congress about abolishing the Federal Reserve! Send To Congress Share With Everyone
By: ccantwell6. on 11 Nov 08, 03:22:22
THere is a Depression coming, be prepared as if a 2yr cat 5 hurricane is slowly heading towards land.
By: mikeyooh7. on 08 Nov 08, 06:32:09
Our biggest concern right now is going to be hyperinflation. China and other countries have started letting go of there holds on federal reserve notes, so where will they go to. Back home to America to flood the market with money that has been given credit because the government says it has the ability to pay its debts. Which it obviously cannot pay its debts.
By: spiritofhouse. on 04 Nov 08, 14:56:09
IMPORTANT The TIME magazine lets the YT-users vote for the person of the year!! /watch?v=Bm94D1TqYwQ It would be awesome if you would leave a comment for RON PAUL and write why you nominate him for the person of the year. The win of this voting would give him a big push. Many more people would get to know him. AND 3 out of 4 (round about) have already voted for him. So if some you you guys would go to this video and vote for him we can make a difference in the next election race!!
By: tylercj. on 30 Oct 08, 02:42:48
Check out my latest video for Chuck Baldwin and Ron Paul!!!!! Its called: November 4th, 2008 Election Day: Restore The Republic!
By: surferpeteinspace. on 27 Oct 08, 22:42:46
Paul is the only man in America worth listening to, and who makes sense. He was not pushed to be front runner. As the puppet masters got scared, rumblings reported from 08 Bilderberg is they expressed their dissatisfaction with Paul, he was gaining too much support exposing them and the FED RESERVE, they realised he has MASS APPEAL with the people, as he is smart, articulate, knowledgeable, speaks truth, wants reform, knows we are all being SCREWED big time. So McCain was in. America is Dead.
By: fju2112. on 24 Oct 08, 11:16:59
What's worse - propping up the value of assets artificially and wiating for the atomic bomb you speak of, or allowing the market to liquidate assets that everyone KNOWS are bad now? Stop spamming your site to us, going to start flagging next time.
By: RonPaulisInsane. on 24 Oct 08, 06:46:59
A financial collapse is like an atomic bomb. It destroys an economy and throws it into horrible depression. Please read my site for a full description.
By: fju2112. on 24 Oct 08, 02:08:07
No, it was due to government policy. Markets correct prices and things go back to normal. The reason we're in the situation we're in now is because the government is too involved in banking via the fed. Get rid of the fed and even though it would be a tough adjustment, it woudln't be nearly as bad as how the government is destroying the dollar. You're going against all common sense if you really think $700billion bailouts, even with the best intentions, are going to do any good - they won't.
By: anupreethi4u. on 23 Oct 08, 22:59:50
hahaha im 100 percent naked right now stop fighting. X4
By: RonPaulisInsane. on 23 Oct 08, 20:56:37
You need to have the assets liquidate in a way that does not cause our financial institutions to fail. A financial collapse would cause a severe monetary contraction due to the massive liquidation of loans. This is because the dollar you put in a financial institution is lent out and circulated among many people. A financial collapse would be like an atomic bomb. The Great Depression was formed due to bank panics.
By: fju2112. on 23 Oct 08, 19:31:19
The reason there's no simple way out of this is because government and industry are in bed together, and our Founders didn't want it that way. YOu can't deny the gov't is propping up the prices of housing in a misguided, short-term plan to "save" an industry that became overheated with bad loans - those assets need to be liquidated QUICKLY for us to get back to a healthy economy. It's common sense. And we don't have capitalism now, it's DEBTISM,partly due to government involvement in the market
By: RonPaulisInsane. on 23 Oct 08, 19:28:17
He proposes letting the market adjust because we can't ever blame anything on capitalism. Our financial system would collapse and throw us into a catastrophic depression. There aren't simple ways out of this. We need to stabilize our system so that we can make changes without destroying our economy.
By: fju2112. on 23 Oct 08, 19:20:28
and the reasons for that collapse are IMPORTANT. The reasons are what Ron Paul offers, and he knows how to fix the problem. What are you offering? A simple way out? Never works.
By: RonPaulisInsane. on 23 Oct 08, 19:17:38
We are dealing with a financial collapse, not a simple market adjustment. Please visit my site to understand how a financial collapse would destroy our economy and cause a global economic meltdown.
By: sinitskyd. on 23 Oct 08, 17:46:36
Ron Paul has totally disappeared. What is he doing now? No news of him neither on main networks nor on the tube
By: fju2112. on 23 Oct 08, 15:54:15
You don't listen to the specifics. Paul is VERY specific in his interviews and website on what the problems are - it's not just printing money, it's a US Gov't that has involved itself in social welfare and bailouts when it has no authority nor business to do so. Enron collapsed, affected mostly Texans, and the value of that asset went down to zero - LET THAT HAPPEN w/ other assets instead of taxing US to keep them afloat!
By: RonPaulisInsane. on 23 Oct 08, 15:49:32
Our financial institutions were on the verge of collapsing and causing a catastrophic depression. Huge firms were toppling in one week, such as Lehman Brothers, AIG, and WAMU. Ron Paul was irresponsible saying this would lead to a short recession. Please visit my site for more details. Ron Paul blames everything on printing too much money. That is simplistic beyond belief. We also had bubbles, financial panics, and economic collapses under the deflationary gold standard, such as in 1890.
By: corruptian. on 23 Oct 08, 12:18:05
I don't know about an amendment, but if we were going to amend the consitution, that would be a perfect amendment batgirl!!
By: fju2112. on 23 Oct 08, 12:14:14
Well hopefully whoever gets in simply gives validation to everything Ron Paul has talked about for over 30 years now. I'd hope he continues to get more press in light of the election and next year when the new president has a hard time implementing any new policies.
By: fju2112. on 23 Oct 08, 12:13:09
what he talks about is WHY we're in the sitaution we're in and how he would fix it - very refreshing compared to some candidates. He haas stated repeatedly that he would allow a recession to happen but it would only last about a year and the market would fix prices naturally, the way it's supposed to happen, with no gov't intervention. what do you not understand about this? the rest that you mentioned are the reasons we're in the mess we're in, but you don't want to believe it apparently.